Comparing Your Options — Bengaluru
Medically reviewed by Dr. Chetan M. Dojode, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon · Last reviewed 20 July 2026
Dr. Chetan M. Dojode · FRCS (Orth, UK) · FEBOT (Euro) · MRCS (UK) · MCh (Orth, UK) · MS (Orth) · MBBS · GMC Specialist Register
21+ Years Experience · 11+ Years NHS UK · MAKO Robotic Certified
Two very different operations, for two very different problems
Patients seen from across Bengaluru, Karnataka and overseas
These operations are often discussed as though they sit on a scale of severity — arthroscopy as the small one, replacement as the big one. They are not two sizes of the same treatment. They address different problems, and choosing between them on the basis of how invasive they sound leads patients badly astray.
Knee arthroscopy is keyhole surgery to treat a specific mechanical problem inside the joint: a torn meniscus causing locking or catching, a loose body, a cartilage flap. It works well when there is a mechanical fault to correct.
It does not treat arthritis. This point deserves emphasis because it is one of the most firmly established findings in modern orthopaedic evidence. Multiple high-quality randomised trials have shown that arthroscopic washout and debridement for degenerative knee arthritis provides no meaningful benefit over placebo or physiotherapy. Major guidelines internationally now advise against it for that indication.
Where arthritis is the cause of pain, the effective options are non-surgical management, joint-preserving surgery such as osteotomy in selected younger patients, partial replacement where only one compartment is affected, or total replacement. An arthroscopy performed on an arthritic knee in the hope of postponing replacement usually achieves nothing except a period of recovery and disappointment.
The difficulty is that many arthritic knees also contain degenerate meniscal tears, which appear on the MRI report and are easily mistaken for the source of pain. Distinguishing a mechanical problem from arthritic pain requires examination and weight-bearing X-rays, not the MRI report alone.
Meniscal tears are extremely common in knees with arthritis, and are frequently found in knees that do not hurt at all. Finding one on a scan therefore does not establish that it is responsible for the symptoms. Where the dominant problem is arthritis, removing part of a degenerate meniscus does not relieve arthritic pain and removes tissue that was still protecting the joint. True mechanical locking — a knee that physically will not straighten — is a different situation and does warrant arthroscopy.
Dr. Chetan M. Dojode has operated in both the United Kingdom and India. His UK joint replacement practice is recorded on the National Joint Registry (NJR) — the world’s largest independent registry of joint replacement outcomes, which tracks implant survival and revision rates for every procedure submitted. That same registry-audited discipline — implant selection, alignment targets and structured follow-up — is applied to every joint replacement he performs in Bengaluru.
No. Multiple randomised controlled trials have shown that arthroscopic washout and debridement for degenerative knee arthritis provides no meaningful benefit over placebo or physiotherapy, and international guidelines advise against it for this indication. Arthroscopy treats mechanical problems, not arthritic cartilage loss.
Where arthritis is the underlying problem, it generally does not. Patients often undergo a recovery period without lasting benefit and require replacement anyway. Non-surgical management, and in selected younger patients joint-preserving surgery such as osteotomy, are more realistic ways to defer replacement.
Not necessarily. Degenerate meniscal tears are very common in arthritic knees and are frequently present in knees without symptoms. The relevant question is whether the tear is causing mechanical symptoms such as true locking, or whether the pain is arthritic. Examination and weight-bearing X-rays answer that; the MRI report alone does not.
Arthroscopy is day-case surgery with walking immediately and return to desk work commonly within one to two weeks. Knee replacement involves a hospital stay of a few days, crutches for several weeks, and substantial improvement over three months with refinement over a year.
In selected patients, yes. Where arthritis is confined to one compartment and the cruciate ligaments are intact, partial replacement preserves bone and ligament and offers faster recovery than total replacement. Suitability is determined by examination and weight-bearing imaging.
Dr. Chetan M. Dojode
FRCS (Tr&Orth) UK · FEBOT
GMC Specialist Register
OSR — OrthoSportsRobotics Clinic / Aarna Clinic, Sahakar Nagar
1182/1, 20th Main Road, A Block,
Bengaluru 560092
UK-trained FRCS orthopaedic surgeon — Sparsh Hospital Yelahanka & OSR — OrthoSportsRobotics Clinic / Aarna Clinic Sahakar Nagar